Sutter to pay $46 million over improper payment allegations
Photo Credit: (AP Photo/Rich Pedroncelli, File) (ASSOCIATED PRESS)
November 18, 2019 03:34 PM
Sutter Health and a group of physicians agreed to pay the federal government $46.1 million to settle allegations that it violated the Stark law by billing Medicare for services by physicians with whom it had improper financial relationships, the Justice Department announced Friday.
A 2014 whistleblower suit filed by former Sutter compliance officer Laurie Hanvey claimed Sutter Memorial Center Sacramento billed Medicare for services referred by Sacramento Cardiovascular Surgeons Medical Group physicians to whom it made payments that exceeded fair market value from 2002 through at least 2012.
Sutter agreed to pay $30.5 million for those alleged violations, the Justice Department said.
Separately, Sutter agreed to pay $15.1 million to resolve other conduct that it self-disclosed to the government, mainly regarding Stark law violations.
Sutter settled allegations that it submitted Medicare claims that resulted from referrals by physicians to whom its hospitals paid compensation that exceeded fair market value; leased office space at below-market rates; and reimbursed physician-recruitment expenses that exceeded the actual recruitment costs.
In addition, several Sutter ambulatory surgical centers allegedly double-billed Medicare by submitting claims that included radiological services.
Sutter said it agreed to repay the federal government but denied any alleged payments for referrals. It said there was no finding that Sutter violated anti-kickback laws.
“Any assertion that the settlement was based upon a finding of payments for referrals is completely inaccurate and Sutter denies any such conduct,” the system said in a statement.
Sutter added that its compliance program self-identified various matters involved in the settlement.
The settlement agreement with Sutter suggested that the government may have remaining claims against the 24-hospital system for conduct that occurred outside the period of Sept. 1, 2012 through Sept. 30, 2014, which it said it was not releasing in this agreement.
Hanvey, who joined Sutter in 2012, will receive $5.9 million as her share of the government’s recovery in the case.
The law firm representing her, Wilbanks & Gouinlock in Atlanta, said Hanvey will move forward with other remaining claims against Sutter, the cardiovascular surgeons group and other Sutter medical groups that were not resolved in this settlement agreement.
Hanvey’s lawsuit complaint also alleged improper payments by Sutter Health to Dr. David K. Roberts, East Bay Perinatal Medical Associates and East Bay Cardiac Surgery Center Medical Group.
Hanvey’s complaint claimed Sutter knowingly paid the three-physician Sacramento Cardiovascular Surgeons Medical Group more than $1.9 million annually to induce referrals through exclusive cardiac call coverage, duplicative medical directorships, and provision of four full-time physician assistants.
She said she issued a hold on the some of these payments in June 2014 but that one of the surgeons, Dr. James Longoria, threatened to shut down Sutter Memorial Center Sacramento’s operating rooms if the payment halt wasn’t lifted.
Sutter “gave in” to the threat, and reissued the payments for the physician assistants via Federal Express, she alleged.
The medical group’s attorney did not respond to a request for comment. It did not admit to liability in the settlement agreement.
This is the second federal settlement by the large health system this year. In April, Sutter Health and several of its affiliated medical foundations agreed to pay $30 million to the government to resolve allegations that the foundations submitted inaccurate information about the health status of Medicare Advantage enrollees, resulting in plans and providers being overpaid.
In addition, the government announced in April that it was joining a whistleblower lawsuit against Sutter Health and its affiliated Palo Alto Medical Foundation alleging they violated the False Claims Act by knowingly submitting unsupported diagnosis scores.